I asked if I could repost his comment here as a blog post, the first time I have ever done such a thing (and I have over 200 blog posts about EHR workflow on this blog!). I’m working on my own blog post about the AHRQ study, but @bobbygvegas beat me to the punch. Good on you mate!
** Chuck and I go back in cyberspace to before our Twitter hookup. He was a co-founder of the EHR product "EncounterPRO," which my own Primary has used since 2004. My doc is also one of my REC clients. EncounterPRO was way late in the game getting certified. I'd frustratingly written my doc and his two partners off for 2012, but, to my extremely pleasant surprise, the vendor (Chuck was long gone) made it to Cert, and I helped them get to 2012 Attestation -- no thanks to their piddley MU "documentation" ( I got a free flu shot out of the deal late one Friday afternoon, though, after a long session).
|Proceedings: Healthcare Systems Process Improvement Conference,|
Las Vegas, USA, Feb. 20, 2012.
Introduction“There’s gold in them thar EHR processes!” (a paraphrase of “There’s gold in them thar hills!” popularly associated with the 1848 California gold rush, but origin debated). EHRs increasingly mediate patient care effectiveness, resource efficiency, and user happiness. EHR process mining is a new medical “imaging” technique, one which allows process diagnosticians to view workflow blockages, errant workflows, and unused resources. Process mining promises to do for healthcare workflow what Röntgen’s invention of X-rays and radiography in 1895 did for medicine proper.
Authors should avoid quoting themselves, but I cannot help but note that in 2005 I wrote about EHR workflow systems:“Process Mining[:] Workflow management systems generate tremendous amounts of time- stamped sequential data as a byproduct of execution of process definitions by workflow engines. By analogy to data mining, analysis of such data (typically collected in log files) is called workflow or process mining . Process mining can discover new and useful process definitions, compare process definitions to what users are really doing, and optimize existing process definitions—all of which can be used to improve ambulatory workflow.” oday, EHR process mining can discover, monitor and improve evidence-based processes (not assumed processes) by extracting knowledge from event logs available in (or “generatable” from) today's EHRs. Process mining can answer three types of questions  for an EHR-using hospital or clinic: What is happening inside processes (Discovery)? It can compare what is happening with what should be happening (Conformance: especially relevant to medical error and patient safety). It can suggest ways to improve healthcare process effectiveness, efficiency, and user and patient satisfaction (Enhancement)...
|3. Sequential and parallel tasks.|
|4. Sequential and Parallel tasks.|
|5. Serial tasks; handoffs.|
|7. Within a defined process: improvisation. |
A photo I shot in Dec 2008 of my friend the eminent
jazz bassist Blaise Sison at the Bellagio.
|8. Outpatient visit door-to-door functional overview.|
I tried to depict the relative consumption of time, a factor missing from the usual "flow diagram."
Gun violence is a public health issue. And the NRA has been disturbingly influential in public health policy. Since the 1990s, it has suppressed research in gun violence by targeting the sources of funding. In 1996, pro-gun members of Congress tried to eliminate the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. They failed in getting rid of the center, but the House of Representatives cut $2.6 million from the CDC’s budget—the exact amount the agency had spent on firearm injury research the previous year. And they added restrictive language on any appropriation to the CDC: “none of the funds available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control.” In 2011, Congress extended the restriction to include all Department of Health and Human Services agencies, including the National Institutes of Health, the nation’s leading medical research agency.
Astoundingly, the NRA was also responsible for a provision in the Affordable Care Act. Into this landmark health care law, NRA-backed legislators quietly inserted “Protection of Second Amendment Gun Rights.” [emphasis mine] This section bans doctors, health care programs, and insurers from “collection of any information relating to the presence or storage of a lawfully possessed firearm or ammunition in the residence or on the property of an individual.” This provision stifles research in gun violence, and it is so vaguely worded it could be interpreted to prohibit doctors from asking patients about guns. This provision was so alarming to the AAP and other child-advocacy groups that they wrote a letter to the Department of Health and Human Services “vehemently” rejecting this provision in the ACA and urging the department to “craft policy” to “limit the harmful impact of this section of the Act.”
‘‘(c) PROTECTION OF SECOND AMENDMENT GUN RIGHTS.—
‘‘(1) WELLNESS AND PREVENTION PROGRAMS.—A wellness and health promotion activity implemented under subsection (a)(1)(D) may not require the disclosure or collection of any information relating to—
‘‘(A) the presence or storage of a lawfully-possessed firearm or ammunition in the residence or on the property of an individual; or
‘‘(B) the lawful use, possession, or storage of a firearm or ammunition by an individual.
‘‘(2) LIMITATION ON DATA COLLECTION.—None of the authorities provided to the Secretary under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or an amendment made by that Act shall be construed to authorize or may be used for the collection of any information relating to—
‘‘(A) the lawful ownership or possession of a firearm or ammunition;
‘‘(B) the lawful use of a firearm or ammunition; or
‘‘(C) the lawful storage of a firearm or ammunition.
‘‘(3) LIMITATION ON DATABASES OR DATA BANKS.—None of the authorities provided to the Secretary under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or an amendment made by that Act shall be construed to authorize or may be used to maintain records of individual ownership or possession of a firearm or ammunition.
‘‘(4) LIMITATION ON DETERMINATION OF PREMIUM RATES OR ELIGIBILITY FOR HEALTH INSURANCE.—A premium rate may not be increased, health insurance coverage may not be denied, and a discount, rebate, or reward offered for participation in a wellness program may not be reduced or withheld under any health benefit plan issued pursuant to or in accordance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or an amendment made by that Act on the basis of, or on reliance upon—
‘‘(A) the lawful ownership or possession of a firearm or ammunition; or
‘‘(B) the lawful use or storage of a firearm or ammunition.
‘‘(5) LIMITATION ON DATA COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR INDIVIDUALS.—No individual shall be required to disclose any information under any data collection activity authorized under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or an amendment made by that Act relating to—
‘‘(A) the lawful ownership or possession of a firearm or ammunition; or ‘‘(B) the lawful use, possession, or storage of a firearm or ammunition.’’.