Visionary Donald J. Trump, 2026

Citation

@SecWar

Will he be tried as an adult?

  

Pete Hegseth’s Troubled Soul 

   

Certain moments are worth paying attention to because they reveal something essential about a person. They act as windows into an individual’s psychological state, their ethics, the orders of their loves and their hates. Such occasions are crystallizing.

That’s been true of Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s Pentagon briefings since the war against Iran began. We haven’t learned anything we didn’t already know about Hegseth in these briefings. But the press conferences have reminded the world why he is exactly the wrong person to hold the position he does.

Wednesday’s briefing, for example, featured the usual Hegseth hubris, strutting, and cockiness. “I stand before you today with one unmistakable message about Operation Epic Fury: America is winning decisively, devastatingly, and without mercy,” he said. He declared that, four days into the mission, Iran is “toast, and they know it. Or at least soon enough they will know it.” He compared the Persian nation’s predicament to that of a football team: “They don’t know what plays to call, let alone how to get in the huddle and call those plays.” There was not even a hint of the challenges that might lie ahead in the conflict with Iran, a nation of 90 million people that borders seven countries—challenges that might include internal fragmentation and chaos, a dangerous insurgency, humanitarian crises, regional destabilization, and global economic disruption.

Now, it may be that none of this comes to pass. The joint American-Israeli air campaign has been stunningly effective. A peaceful, enlightened, democratic, pro-American regime may emerge. And even if Iran turns out to fall far short of that ideal, it could still be that the next regime is better than the previous, wicked one. So the world may be better off as a result of this war. Or it may not. It’s simply too early to tell. Wars that begin well don’t always end well, and they often produce unintended consequences.

Hegseth displayed the prickliness and defensiveness we’ve come to expect, along with his resentment against “fake news.” Hegseth complained that the war-related deaths of six Americans were front-page news. The press, he claimed, “only wants to make the president look bad.” There were also the requisite shots at Democrats, who he said are “rooting against the country

But what was most striking about Hegseth’s press conference was his emotional affect, his delight in celebrating mercilessness, his talk of death and destruction raining down from the skies, his glee in “punching them while they’re down, which is exactly how it should be.”

We have seen this manosphere affect before from the defense secretary. At a press briefing on Monday, he mocked “our traditional allies who wring their hands and clutch their pearls, hemming and hawing about the use of force.” In this war, there would be “no stupid rules of engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy-building exercise, no politically correct wars,” he vowed. “We fight to win.” He added, “We are not defenders anymore. We are warriors, trained to kill the enemy and break their will. History is watching. Be the force you swore an oath to be—focused, disciplined, lethal, and unbreakable.”…

What an embarrassment. He is egregiously unqualified.

 

That foregoing excerpt is from The Atlantic. They have recently published a raft of excellent pieces on the Trump Administration's attack on Iran. I've been a reader and subscriber for decades. (The photo above is one I Photoshopped using a pic found elsewhere on the internet.)

 

_______

 
"1979?" HOW ABOUT 1953? 

 

I really tire of pundits going no further back than 1979 and the Iranian revolution and hostage debacle that ousted the dictatorial Shah. to wit:

 

 

1953? I was 7. I am now 80.

 

Below: Some quick pertinent documentary history (~40 minutes total). 

 

 

There are relatively few clean hands among all of these geopolitical players.

UPDATE 

 

CODA

 

FYI, an inexpensive ($3.99), relatively quick, well-regarded read on the history of Iran/Persia.

Kristi Noem, buh-bye.

 

Why Trump Changed His Mind on Kristi Noem

Kristi noem played “Hot Mama” as the walk-up song for her formal introduction at the Department of Homeland Security headquarters in January 2025. President Trump had put her in charge of his signature campaign promise—the largest mass-deportation campaign in U.S. history—and Noem took a fast, flashy approach to the job. She dressed as a Border Patrol agent and an ICE officer, and rode horseback at Mount Rushmore in ads. She flew to El Salvador and posed in front of a prison cell crammed with tattooed inmates. She made no apologies for aggressive enforcement tactics on American streets, even those that likely broke the law, or for the deaths of two U.S. citizens who opposed her approach.

But it wasn’t the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis earlier this year that finally cost Noem her job today, making her the first ousted Cabinet secretary of Trump’s second term. Instead, it was her self-promotion. 

 

Noem’s standing was already shaky when she went to Capitol Hill to testify this week. On Tuesday, Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana, a Republican, asked whether Trump himself had approved Noem’s $220 million ad campaign that featured her urging migrants to self-deport. Noem said yes, and defended the ads as “effective.”

The ads “were effective in your name recognition,” Kennedy told Noem, saying that she put Trump “in a terribly awkward spot.” He was implying the commission of a cardinal sin for a Trump Cabinet member: seeking to outshine the president. Kennedy told reporters today that he had spoken with Trump. “Her version of the truth and the president’s version of the truth are decidedly different,” Kennedy said...

The Rescuer-Victim-Persecutor Triangle writ large

 

Before I get to the broad clinical underpinnings of this Transactional Analysis-based “Life Scripts” allusion, let’s just cut to the current Iran strikes chase. It’s really rather simple:

I, President Donald J. Trump, the beneficent, altruistic world-leading intervenor, arrogate to myself the imperative of rescuing you, the Victim. In the wake of my unprecedented, selfless efforts, should you respond with insufficient compliance and gratitude, I will then have no choice but, reluctantly, to forcefully apply appropriate and necessary sanctions on you—which, of course, our naive, unmanly Woke Liberals would call Persecution.

 

ON "PERSONA"

 

A lot of negative connotation in the dictionary list of synonyms. Steiner posits that to the extent we adopt "life scripts" (mostly beginning in young childhood) we forego full moral agency and concomitant rational thinking. We are hemmed in by being the "stars" and aggrieved "victims" in our melodramas. People like Donald Trump take this to exasperating, often tragic extremes. In the current context, the President exhorts the Iranian people to "take your country back" in the wake of his armed attacks while "hinting" that, if they "screw it up," they too will come to experience his wrath via his co-starring role as "Persecutor-in-Chief."

 

Originally published in 1976. Updated edition released in 2007.

 

A FEW QUICK SNIPS

 

 

A long book, 528 pages. The focus is nearly entirely at the clinical interpersonal - transactional level, but the broader sociopolitical implications are rather clear, if only infrequently cited episodically. I stand confidently by my speculation that Donald Trump will betray the emerging Iranian civil society with rhetorical Persecution the moment it becomes geopolitically expedient.

March Madness 2026

 Stock markets will surely be “fun“ this coming week.
The Middle East will surely not be.