Search the KHIT Blog

Monday, March 23, 2026

The coming Christian Nationalist Surveillance State?

This stuff is heavily intertwined with the increasingly militant patriarchal, mysogynistic "Christian Nationalism" movement (link to prior posts). These people are obsessive where it comes to outlawing abortion and otherwise eliminating reproductive rights.
 
A couple of relevant new reads:


Just begun reading those. 

Below, I watched this documentary live on CNN last night. They've yet to post it to YouTube. It was outstanding. Detailed, nuanced, forthright.
 
 
Related interview with Pamela Brown:
 
 
BTW, below, you may be aware of the Fundie religious activism of our Secretary of War.

 
PROFESSOR MICHELE GOODWIN
In the twenty-first century reproduction translates differently across class and race lines. On inspection, examples abound in this context, but assisted reproductive technology (ART) provides a particularly provocative illustration of my point. In that sphere, liberty and risk translate into a multi-billion-dollar industry, where a woman’s reproductive possibilities resemble a candy store of options: freedom to purchase ova and sperm in her local community or across the country and world, in vitro fertilization, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) of ova, embryo grading, cryopreservation of ova, assisted hatching, embryo transfer, day-five blast transfers, and more. This dizzying array of options is mostly unchecked by federal and state regulations, leaving physicians and their wealthier patients to coordinate pregnancies according to personal choices. 

Technology facilitates a degree of leisure associated with some of these practices, as a few options described above are easily coordinated from the comfort and privacy of home. Functionally, then, with the click of a computer button, an intended parent may purchase sperm, rent a womb, buy ova, and select a clinic to assist in the harvesting, implantation, or embryo development processes. For wealthy women (infertile or not), reproductive privacy and freedom are tangible concepts in uninterrupted operation. Noticeably, there is little, if any, state regulation or interference in this domain, despite considerable risks, poor health outcomes, and miscarriages associated with some of these medicines. 

By contrast, recent criminal prosecutions targeting destitute pregnant women illuminate another reproductive space, where the threat of state intervention through punishment and extralegal retribution overarch pregnancies and compromise the physician-patient relationship. In this alternate reproductive realm, public regulation trumps expectations of privacy. Undeniably, in the United States a poor pregnant woman’s reproductive options are deeply constrained and contested. For example, a woman’s poverty and drug dependence or use during pregnancy might result in heightened legal consequences, including the threat of life imprisonment, birthing while in jail, and even shackling during labor, depending on the state in which the pregnant woman resides. 

A poor woman determined to carry a pregnancy to term often unwittingly exposes herself to nefarious interagency collaborations between police and physicians, quite possibly leading to criminal prosecution, incarceration, and giving birth while in highly unsanitary prison conditions, sometimes without the appropriate aid of hospital physicians and staff. But make no mistake, all women should be wary of the political mobilization against reproductive health, rights, and justice. 

Today, it is not uncommon for a headline to feature a tragic story about a woman giving birth alone in a jail, without the aid of anyone, let alone medical staff. This is what happened to Diana Sanchez as she screamed and “writhed on the small bed inside her cell … gripping the thin mattress with one hand,” as she tried frantically to free a leg as the baby was crowning. A Washington Post headline captured her experience this way: “Nobody Cared”: A Woman Gave Birth Alone in a Jail Cell After Her Cries for Help Were Ignored, Lawsuit Says.”

Sadly, these are not outlier incidents, but rather what has bled into the soil of reproductive politics in the United States, which now uses pregnancy as a proxy for punishment, particularly against poor women. The depth of state-sanctioned cruelty targeted toward poor pregnant women seemingly has no boundaries in contemporary American politics…

Goodwin, Michele (2020). Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood (Preface). Kindle Edition.  
APRIL AJOY
1. America Is the Best 

Once upon a time, a group of the greatest, strongest, handsomest, and manliest men set out on a holy quest. These men fled the tyrannical country of England to start a new country, where they would have the freedom to worship Jesus how they wanted. These great men, who were basically Christ’s disciples 2.0, embarked on a journey to fight for their religious freedom. 

They loaded up on ships that sailed across the ocean on this God-ordained mission. Sure, some may have technically brought enslaved people with them, but it was a different time. And they treated them with the utmost respect, kindness, and love. 

And sure, some people technically already inhabited the new land, but they didn’t really count because they weren’t Christians. They needed Jesus. And the people in the colonies, set up by the righteous men from England, helped these native people have a much better life—because they now had Jesus to comfort them on the Trail of Tears (we don’t really need to talk about that, though, because again, it was a different time). 

Then the big bad godless British people wanted to stake their claim on the new land. But God would not stand for such evil in his new country, so he declared war through his chosen one, George Washington. God supernaturally blessed his troops to defeat the British. Yeah, some people died, and a lot of the British were sort of Christian, too, but it was the price of freedom. And the greatest country the world would ever know was born: the United States of America. 

Okay, so maybe some bad people in the southern part of the country refused to stop owning people and tried to repeat what Americans had just done to the British, but they failed! Because God was on the side of the holiest president of all, Republican Abraham Lincoln, who signed the Emancipation Proclamation and ended racism forever. 

Over the next 150 years, America spread this gospel message of hope and freedom all over the world. God blessed our country in every war we ever fought. The Axis Powers of World War I? We beat ’em. Nazis? Really beat them. Vietnam? Uh… not sure but I think we probably won. The Cold War? Tear down that wall. The War on Terror? Mission accomplished. All these victories occurred because America was founded as a Christian nation, and as long as it stayed the most Christian nation on earth, it would continue to be supernaturally blessed. Hallelujah, the Great I Am and Uncle Sam were quite the team! 

This—almost exactly this—is what I wholeheartedly believed about American history for most of my life. I was taught that I was on the side of good, and everything I did was done with the goal of keeping that goodness going for generations to come. 

No one told me about the true, brutal history of Native American displacement and genocide. I vaguely knew about slavery, Jim Crow, and the KKK—whose members were largely Christians—and the fuzzy morality of using nuclear bombs. None of that fit the narrative I was taught. The message I received was very simple: America is the best. Period. 

I know now this belief is literally the definition of “nationalism,” which Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary defines as “loyalty and devotion to a nation,” especially with “a sense of national consciousness exalting one nation above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations.” 

So… pretty much exactly what I grew up believing. 

Of course, we never used the term “Nationalist.” It was simply called patriotism, and it ranked just below holiness. This is the first tenet of Christian Nationalism: The belief that America has been specially selected by God, and that it has a special place in God’s plan for redemption...


Ajoy, April. Star-Spangled Jesus: Leaving Christian Nationalism and Finding A True Faith (pp. 3-5). (Function). Kindle Edition.
One impressive young woman. Great sense of wry humor.
 
SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGIES

First, a bit of current Jacob Ward. (He is da bomb)
 

Anyone remember "Total Information Awareness?" 
 
Then, Michele Goodwin brings up the issue of forced drug testing of pregnant women of lesser means (disproportionately minorities. Hmmm... See my 297 pg 1998 grad thesis (pdf) on coerced drug testing policies (which was primarily focused on workplace surveillance).
 
Lots to consider. Stay tuned...

Sunday, March 22, 2026

World War XXXXVII

  
Below: A couple more random Democrat Enemy Within riffs.


What awaits the world this coming week? Stay tuned...
 
WORLD WAR XXXXVII UPDATE
 
OK, TACO Don has "postponed" his threatened strikes on Iranian power plants for 5 days because suitably cowed Teheran is putatively now "negotiating" in the wake of his latest bombast.

 
I gotta move on to some other stuff for now...

Wednesday, March 18, 2026

Israel strikes Iran's South Pars gas field

This complex accounts for 70% of Iran's natural gas output.
Iranian retaliation news reports are mounting by the hour.
U.S. stock markets cratered in reaction.

 
ERRATUM: "IMMINENT THREAT"
A bit of pedantic irascibility. The phrase "Imminent Threat" as being cavalierly bandied about of late per the Iran attack, if not all the way to "oxymoronic," is clearly an unhelpfully vague cliche. "Imminent?" How soon? Minutes? Hours? Days? Weeks, Months?...
 
The big gripe goes to "threat" in the context of expressing the possibility of an adverse event. To the stats analyst, "threat" means a "risk" of harm that cannot be quantified into numerical data appropriate for rank-ordering useful for estimating "expected (loss) value." A necessary adjunct of that is "vulnerability" to the risk posed. Moreover, it’s fundamental to acknowledge that risk assessment is quite often multifaceted. We properly have to burn a lot of mental calories, assessing the relative costs and benefits of our actions. Sadly, infuriatingly, a reality lost on our current president.
 
I'm having a bit of dubiety that our DNI Tulsi Gabbard is a clueless naif in the foregoing empirical basics. Perhaps, but she's likely just bullshitting the congressional committees and the press in the panic over perhaps being fired by Trump.
 
He, (bankrupter of multiple casinos and other resorts) who, in her SMH/WTAF? testimony, is the only federal executive With the acumen and authority to assess what constitutes an "imminent threat." 
 
Yeah. Sure. Right. We can all sleep better now.
UPDATES
 

Next...
 

I encourage y'all to watch / listen to this carefully in light of current events.

Tuesday, March 17, 2026

Dire Strait? Pottery Barn Rule update.

"Trump says U.S. doesn't need help defending Strait of Hormuz after allies refuse."
 
I guess we will see. Sooner rather than later, one would think.

Sunday, March 15, 2026

Academy Awards 2026

  

All of this mindless Trump war stuff of late has really put some enervating dings in my topical focus. So, I thought I'd just veg out for a whole evening and watch the entire Academy Awards show. Worth it, in ways I'd not anticipated. to wit:

What Bugonia reveals about the real search for aliens
In the Oscar-nominated film Bugonia, Emma Stone’s character is accused of being an alien. But would we know extraterrestrial life if we saw it on Earth?

[Scientific American] In Bugonia, it all starts with bees. A warehouse worker, Teddy (played by Jesse Plemons), accuses high-powered CEO Michelle (Emma Stone) of being an extraterrestrial who is secretly killing bees, disrupting the ecosystems humans depend on for food.

“The signs,” Teddy says, “are obvious.”

It’s a funny and gripping premise. But at the center of the movie is a compelling question that scientists all over the world are working to answer: How would we know if we saw an alien?

To identify alien life, scientists must be able to tell that the thing they are considering is alive. But there’s not as much consensus about what “life” really is as you might think.

"We don’t have a really clear theoretical and experimental program to ask questions about the nature of life,” says Sara Walker, an astrobiologist and theoretical physicist at Arizona State University. Essentially, our working criteria are based exclusively on life on Earth. But across the vastness of the universe, life might present as radically different from what we’ve seen on our planet.

Walker theorizes that life may not have to be based on organic molecules, cells and DNA, for example. Rather it might be easier to identify life using what she and her colleagues call “assembly theory,” which means spotting complex systems that stem from traceable lineages and that have changed their environment in a way that only a living entity could…

What might that look like beyond Earth? Well, we have no idea—yet. “The vast possibility space [of] life far exceeds both what has been actualized here on Earth in our one single biosphere and also potentially our imaginations,” says Mike Wong, an astrobiologist at the Carnegie Institution for Science’s Earth & Planets Laboratory.

Every living thing on Earth has been honed by millions of years of evolution and coevolution alongside all the other creatures and the planet’s different environments. It’s reasonable to assume that an alien probably won’t look anything like an Earthling, Wong says, because its evolutionary history could be determined by a radically different world with unique pressures and environments.

And as for Bugonia, “I think it would be highly unlikely that aliens would look like Emma Stone,” Wong says…


"Sara Walker," 'eh?
 

Yes, indeed. Sara Imari Walker. Swoon...
 
 
OK, "OTHER SENSES, OTHER WORLDS?"
 
Yep.
 
I'll get back to prior post topics ASAP. apropos,

 
Lots of concerns focused on AI and toxic social media of late. Jacob Ward is on it big-time. See here as well.
 
ERRATUM 
Ugh.
 
CODA: A "TRUTH SOCIAL" MESSAGE FROM YOUR FAVORITE PRESIDENT
"Iran has long been known as a Master of Media Manipulation and Public Relations. They are Militarily ineffective and weak, but are really good at "feeding" the very appreciative Fake News Media false information. Now, A.l. has become another Disinformation weapon that Iran uses, quite well, considering they are being annihilated by the day. They showed phony "Kamikaze Boats," shooting at various Ships at Sea, which looks wonderful, powerful, and vicious, but these Boats don't exist—It's all false information to show how "tough" their already defeated Military is! The five U.S. Refueling Planes that were supposedly struck down and badly damaged, according to The Wall Street Journal's false reporting, and others, are all in service, with the exception of one, which will soon be flying the skies. Buildings and Ships that are shown to be on fire are not—It's FAKE NEWS, generated by A.l. For instance, Iran, working in close coordination with the Fake News, showed the Lincoln Aircraft Carrier, one of the largest and most prestigious Ships in the World, burning uncontrollably in the Ocean. Not only was it not burning, it was not even shot at—Iran knows better than to do that! The story was knowingly FAKE and, in a certain way, you can say that those Media Outlets that generated it should be brought up on Charges for TREASON for the dissemination of false information! The fact is, Iran is being decimated, and the only battles they "win" are those that they create through Al, and are distributed by Corrupt Media Outlets. The Radical Leftwing Press knows this full well, but continues to go forward with false stories and LIES. That's why their Approval Rating is so low, and I can win a Presidential Election, IN A LANDSLIDE, getting only 5% positive Press—They have no credibility! I am so thrilled to see Brendan Carr, the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), looking at the licenses of some of these Corrupt and Highly Unpatriotic "News" Organizations. They get Billions of Dollars of FREE American Airwaves, and use it to perpetuate LIES, both in News and almost all of their Shows, including the Late Night Morons, who get gigantic Salaries for horrible Ratings, and never get, as I used to say in The Apprentice, "FIRED." Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP."

Saturday, March 14, 2026

"I want to talk to you tonight about 'Anger'."

Malcolm Gladwell comes to Baltimore.
    
On deck. He was excellent. Canadian Wry Bred. Dude, if your current career goes south on you, you would utterly kill at Stand-Up.
 
Certainly no shortage of anger around the world these days. Interesting that he was so self-deprecatingly funny.
 
Tangentially: 
 
"THE TIPPING POINT?"

 
 
More to come... 

Friday, March 13, 2026

Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Well, Ok, THAT was "exciting."

Baltimore, March 11, 2026, just after 7 pm.
   
OK, then...

Both of our iPhones went code red loud.
 
  

I screen-grabbed these from my iPhone and iPad. The little encircled blue arrow north of downtown 
"Baltimore" denotes our house.
 
OK, down to the basement storage closet under the stairs. Pino Noir in hand.

 
8:20 pm. All clear. Refill the wine. I had had other plans. Bail to NetFlix.
 
Today was weird. 85F. Normal temp here for March 11th is 50F. Recall my "Goundhog MONTH" post on our unusually bitter early winter.
 
We moved here in April 2019 from The SF Bay Area. The summer that year could boil asphalt.
 
THURSDAY UPDATE
 
1 pm. It's now snowing. Wet, but snowing big flakes, as the temp drops. Ambient 37F, windchill 25F. Ugh. Below, on my front porch.
 

Sunday, March 8, 2026

Visionary Donald J. Trump, 2026

Monday March 9th. President Trump holds a Presser at his Doral FL resort. A tour de force of incoherent, repetitive contradictions taken to new mumbling depths.
 

Friday, March 6, 2026

@SecWar

Will he be tried as an adult?
  
   
Certain moments are worth paying attention to because they reveal something essential about a person. They act as windows into an individual’s psychological state, their ethics, the orders of their loves and their hates. Such occasions are crystallizing.

That’s been true of Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s Pentagon briefings since the war against Iran began. We haven’t learned anything we didn’t already know about Hegseth in these briefings. But the press conferences have reminded the world why he is exactly the wrong person to hold the position he does.

Wednesday’s briefing, for example, featured the usual Hegseth hubris, strutting, and cockiness. “I stand before you today with one unmistakable message about Operation Epic Fury: America is winning decisively, devastatingly, and without mercy,” he said. He declared that, four days into the mission, Iran is “toast, and they know it. Or at least soon enough they will know it.” He compared the Persian nation’s predicament to that of a football team: “They don’t know what plays to call, let alone how to get in the huddle and call those plays.” There was not even a hint of the challenges that might lie ahead in the conflict with Iran, a nation of 90 million people that borders seven countries—challenges that might include internal fragmentation and chaos, a dangerous insurgency, humanitarian crises, regional destabilization, and global economic disruption.

Now, it may be that none of this comes to pass. The joint American-Israeli air campaign has been stunningly effective. A peaceful, enlightened, democratic, pro-American regime may emerge. And even if Iran turns out to fall far short of that ideal, it could still be that the next regime is better than the previous, wicked one. So the world may be better off as a result of this war. Or it may not. It’s simply too early to tell. Wars that begin well don’t always end well, and they often produce unintended consequences.

Hegseth displayed the prickliness and defensiveness we’ve come to expect, along with his resentment against “fake news.” Hegseth complained that the war-related deaths of six Americans were front-page news. The press, he claimed, “only wants to make the president look bad.” There were also the requisite shots at Democrats, who he said are “rooting against the country

But what was most striking about Hegseth’s press conference was his emotional affect, his delight in celebrating mercilessness, his talk of death and destruction raining down from the skies, his glee in “punching them while they’re down, which is exactly how it should be.”

We have seen this manosphere affect before from the defense secretary. At a press briefing on Monday, he mocked “our traditional allies who wring their hands and clutch their pearls, hemming and hawing about the use of force.” In this war, there would be “no stupid rules of engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy-building exercise, no politically correct wars,” he vowed. “We fight to win.” He added, “We are not defenders anymore. We are warriors, trained to kill the enemy and break their will. History is watching. Be the force you swore an oath to be—focused, disciplined, lethal, and unbreakable.”…
What an embarrassment. He is egregiously unqualified.
 
Sorry, that was irascibly funny. Found it online.
That foregoing lead-in article excerpt is from The Atlantic. They have recently published a raft of excellent pieces on the Trump Administration's attack on Iran. I've been a reader and subscriber for decades. (The photo above is one I Photoshopped using a pic found elsewhere on the internet.)
 
_______
 
"1979?" HOW ABOUT 1953? 
 
really tire of pundits going no further back than 1979 and the Iranian revolution and hostage debacle that ousted the dictatorial Shah. to wit:
 
 
1953? I was 7. I am now 80.
 
Below: Some quick pertinent documentary history (~40 minutes total). 
 
 
There are relatively few clean hands among all of these geopolitical players.

UPDATE 
 

CODA
 
FYI, an inexpensive ($3.99), relatively quick, well-regarded read on the history of Iran/Persia.

Thursday, March 5, 2026

Kristi Noem, buh-bye.

Kristi noem played “Hot Mama” as the walk-up song for her formal introduction at the Department of Homeland Security headquarters in January 2025. President Trump had put her in charge of his signature campaign promise—the largest mass-deportation campaign in U.S. history—and Noem took a fast, flashy approach to the job. She dressed as a Border Patrol agent and an ICE officer, and rode horseback at Mount Rushmore in ads. She flew to El Salvador and posed in front of a prison cell crammed with tattooed inmates. She made no apologies for aggressive enforcement tactics on American streets, even those that likely broke the law, or for the deaths of two U.S. citizens who opposed her approach.

But it wasn’t the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis earlier this year that finally cost Noem her job today, making her the first ousted Cabinet secretary of Trump’s second term. Instead, it was her self-promotion. 
 
Noem’s standing was already shaky when she went to Capitol Hill to testify this week. On Tuesday, Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana, a Republican, asked whether Trump himself had approved Noem’s $220 million ad campaign that featured her urging migrants to self-deport. Noem said yes, and defended the ads as “effective.”
The ads “were effective in your name recognition,” Kennedy told Noem, saying that she put Trump “in a terribly awkward spot.” He was implying the commission of a cardinal sin for a Trump Cabinet member: seeking to outshine the president. Kennedy told reporters today that he had spoken with Trump. “Her version of the truth and the president’s version of the truth are decidedly different,” Kennedy said...